IMR Executive

Account Manager

Competitive Package
UK - London

Windows 7 'vulnerable to 80 per cent of viruses'

Bookmark with Social network
Windows 7 'vulnerable to 80 per cent of viruses'

Security vendor warns new OS still needs antivirus package

Windows 7 is vulnerable to 80 per cent of viruses, a security software vendor has warned.

Sophos’s senior security advisor, Chester Wisniewski, reported in his official blog that during a trial of Microsoft’s new operating system on a clean PC, the machine became infected with eight out of the ten viruses tested.

Engineers loaded a full version of Windows 7 without installing an anti-virus package, and configured it to follow system defaults for UAC (User Account Control).

According to Wisniewski’s blog, ten unique samples which arrived in the SophosLabs feed were selected “to see how well the newer, more secure version of Windows and UAC held up.”

“Unfortunately, despite Microsoft's claims, Windows 7 disappointed just like earlier versions of Windows. The good news is that, of the freshest 10 samples that arrived, 2 would not operate correctly under Windows 7,” he wrote. “Lesson learned? You still need to run anti-virus on Windows 7.”

Advertisement

Windows 7 'vulnerable to 80 per cent of viruses'

posted by Gareth Evans Nov 04, 2009 at 11:21 am
1

So that's a high quality, totally indepenent view then ! The last sentence says it all “Lesson learned? You still need to run anti-virus on Windows 7.”

Wow ! What an inexpected conclusion. It would have been good if he'd explained just how stupid people would have to be to actually infect the PC ? What did they click on ? What meesages did they ignore etc etc

  • + 0 
  • - 0 
  • 0

Windows 7 'vulnerable to 80 per cent of viruses'

posted by Eddie Rich Nov 04, 2009 at 3:53 pm
2

Another crap headline grabber.

Perhaps a more accurate headline would be "We can confirm that 8 viruses can infect a windows 7 pc but 2 can't."

How can you base it on "ten unique samples" which were "selected" rather than what should be, "serveral thousands samples" which were "randomly selected".

Rubbish headline grabbing research designed to sell more Sohpos. Hardly valid I think...

  • + 0 
  • - 0 
  • 0

Leave a Comment